< Back to The Hood
Canon 5D MarkII
Anyone gotten a hold on this camera yet? I am dying to know what your experience has been if so because this one has me...I want it! 1080p Video | 30 Frames Per Second | 21 Megapixel Still Camera Shots? Sign me up!! Who has one?
Tokyo Reality (Canon 5D MarkII) from utsuru on Vimeo. Very Impressive. I have a feeling if a still can do this, then the next generation of video cameras will me CRAZY!
Yup. Bit the bullet and am now using this camera. It's pretty sweet! Still trying to figure out how best to make it work!
Fred, does the updated firmware give you full manual controls when recording video?
Any samples to post?
Looks good as always Fred, I am sure on a BD disc the difference is amazing but webwise do you think the difference is worth it?
For me it's worth it for several reasons:
60% of the packages I sell are video and still photos. In the past, it was a lot of wasted time taking a still of the front, switching cameras, taking video of the front, hauling around two camera bags, a tripod, taking a still of the back of the house, switching cameras, etc. blah blah blah.
On days when I'm shooting 5-7 tours in a day, that sucks up a LOT of time I need back! It's a long day anyway, but swapping cameras every other shot takes up a great deal of my time. This way - one camera, one bag for everything. Loving that part!
There are two other big advantages to this camera for me:
It takes all the regular Canon lenses, and I already own about $4000 dollars in high quality lenses can use now with video. Sweet. Because of that any normal video camera that compares right now costs as much as a car! This offers a LOT for the money. The wide angle lens is FAR better than what I was using. In fact, that lens costs more than the CAMERA I was using! So, the quality is infinitely better in that regard for real estate.
This camera has a full frame sensor and unbelievable low light capability, always a problem with interiors. So that should be a nice feature as well.
Of course, I also still need to learn how to USE this thing, as it's definitely different than a video camera on so many levels. But it's doable., After a couple of hours I got it to work on my Steadicam - that was my biggest concern. But the thing is wicked heavy - fatigue sets in pretty quickly. Didn't realize how lightweight my other camera was! But the weight I think makes it a little smoother, so that's a plus.
Biggest reason: I needed a new toy.
We'll see. Still just trying to figure the thing out! But overall, it works pretty well for what I do.
<embed src="http://www.wellcomemat.com/wm_video_1/DE65A7BEC6" allowScriptAccess="always" allowFullScreen="true" quality="high" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getFlashPlayer" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="393"></embed>
Layne,
Your WMAT embed code string didn't work (comment #16) to actually embed the player, so I clicked the src="LINK" within it and it didn't successfully launch a video. So I checked out your go2virtual WMAT channel for a video that had the DE65A7BEC6 id ... I didn't quite look for it very hard once there on your channel becuase the first video that came up was a video tour that you labeled "canon 5D Mark II" and comments say it's your first shoot with it: http://www.wellcomemat.com/video/6936244A6E.
So ... I'm thinking the DE65A7BEC6 video might have been transferred to a client or something and the one to which you're referring. But regardless, thanks for sharing the footage with us.
It'll be interesting to see more footage from the 5D Mark II as more filmmaker start using it for video.
That's all I've been shooting with for the past couple of months... LOVE IT.
Thanks for all the feedback
I was trying to embed this
but forgot the embedding has been disabled on this board (Christian please fix that)
heres the link I was trying to share
http://www.wellcomemat.com/video/DE65A7BEC6
Love the 5DmkII that I sold all my sony Video cameras to buy canon lenses
Layne,
I saw that "Las Vegas" video on your channel. Very cool footage / editing / music. It had the same feel in DOF and low light quality that I've seen in other 5D Mark II videos and in the "Toyko Reality" Vimeo clip embeded above. So other than the property tour that you label "canon 5D mark II" & "first shoot", without glancing up to the video ID as I watched, I kind of thought that might also have been from the 5D Mark II.
Christian,
I see embedding worked on comment #1 above ... the Tokyo Reality clip on Vimeo. To my recollection, comment #1 is the only instance of video embedding I've seen. So embedding must have been disabled beaause of / after that. In the end, it's not too big a deal, but I agree with Layne ... in that it'd be nice to illustrate / enhance posts & comments with video/clips directly (w/out opening a new browser tab/window).
I was at a church picnic Sunday and one of the photographer / videographer guys was getting shots. From a distance, I couldn't tell brand / model, but it was big. Then, as my daughter was at the face-painting table, he got some shots and/or footage of her getting a rainbow put on her cheek. (The strap said 5D Mark II.)
I resisted the temptation to interrupt his work ... hoping to catch him after he was all done getting his shots/footage and get a peek at it. But ... I never bumped into him again. I look forward to possibly seeing his HD shots/footage of my daughter in a video down the road sometime, if that scene makes the cut.
Frad, or anybody else using the 5D,
Can you describe the editing and encoding process as far as strain on your machine, and the time that it takes. I love what I see from this camera, but am a little concerned about the processing required.
Also, I saw that it will record in 640X480. Anybody try this out? I wonder if the footage would be as good (once on the net) with a lot less strain on a system.
Garrett: You can't edit the native files produced by the 5D. It'll choke your computer and make you crazy.
I've been converting it via MPEG Streamclip to the Apple Intermediate Codec, which is easily edited in any editing program. Time wise it's really not bad.... since it doesn't record to tape, you eliminate the transfer process.... just drag the files off the compact flash card. So timewise it's really about the same, maybe even faster - even considering that I have to transcode it before I can edit it. Never tried 640 x 480 - seems like that defeats the purpose of having a camera that you spend $4000 on!
Thanks for the info, Fred.
Yeah, it probably does defeat the purpose...just wonder how good 640X480 can look from a full-frame sensor with a nice Canon lens.
Is there an easy way to see your most recent work?
Not sure what's up here shot with that camera... I have a dozen or so tours that I shot this week... will probably upload them tomorrow if I get a chance. Here's one I did the other day .... and another one







